tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2545318833391348896.post3250565210922028700..comments2009-04-17T10:55:44.549-07:00Comments on The Crucible: Relativism: A misuse of termsAaron Snellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08551668915973379312noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2545318833391348896.post-55459472824264601472009-04-17T10:55:00.000-07:002009-04-17T10:55:00.000-07:00Aaron, thanks for your careful report of my disagr...Aaron, thanks for your careful report of my disagreement with Greg Koukl. I have often be elated by Greg's wisdom while listening to his radio show. After a couple years, I still believe that Greg (and you) are very wrong about defending, voting for, campaigning for, urging Christians to support those who aggressively advocate killing the innocent, as Rudy Giuliani does, and I hope you will acknowledge that a government official who does not himself physically kill anyone but advocates (de-criminalizes, funds, etc.) the intentional killing of the innocent are, in fact, guilty of murder.<br /><br />By the way, have you seen the AmericanRTL Youtube video The Ann Coulter Hang-Ups at http://CoulterApology.com ?<br /><br />It's right in line with our discussion, and exposes how Christian leaders who will defend child killers (this time, it's Mitt Romney) also will utterly misrepresent the facts (claiming that child-killers are actually pro-life). Here is my interpretation of this: when a Christian is willing, in hopes of achieving some transient political victory, to undermine God's enduring command Do not murder, and to do evil that good may come of it, then such a Christian is already so far down the road of misrepresentation of the truth, that incidental misinformation, negligence regarding the child-killing legacy of "their" candidate, etc., are simply to be expected as part of their politically-motivated moral slide into relativism.Bob Enyarthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15111325992667141534noreply@blogger.com